During Wednesday’s proceedings, Senior Advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, appearing for the Muslim petitioners, informed the bench that the site designated by the state administration was located nearly 2 km away from Bhojshala. Urging the court to hear an application filed in this regard at the earliest, Ahmadi pointed out that worshippers had already missed Friday prayers due to the distance.

Disputing the distance claim, Solicitor General Mehta stated that the allotted spot was approximately 900 metres from the complex. He assured the court, however, that he would personally coordinate with local authorities to find a location closer to the site.

“I have asked them to identify a nearby site, and the process is going on,” Mehta submitted.

CJI Surya Kant said the court would hear the application on Friday, directing the state government to locate a suitable adjacent site in the interim.

Justice Bagchi said the court’s order be followed in letter and spirit. SG Mehta assured that it will be followed.

Background of the dispute

The medieval structure in Madhya Pradesh’s Dhar district has long been a subject of competing claims. While Hindus consider the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI)-protected complex a temple dedicated to Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati), Muslims regard it as the Kamal Maula mosque.

Under a 2003 arrangement established by the ASI, Hindus were permitted to perform puja on Tuesdays, while Muslims offered Friday namaz.

In 2024, the Madhya Pradesh High Court ordered a scientific survey of the complex by the ASI, observing that its nature and character needed to be “demystified and freed from the shackles of confusion”. The subsequent ASI report noted that the existing structure incorporated architectural elements from earlier temples.

On May 15, the High Court held that the complex holds the religious character of a temple, a ruling that is currently being challenged before the Supreme Court.