“After receiving notice, the opposite party (Amazon) did not appear before the commission and did not prove its defence. So the opposite party is directly bound to redress the grievances caused to the complainant. Therefore, we hold that the opposite party is liable to refund Rs 1945.30 to the complainant, along with Rs 8,000 as compensation for mental agony caused to the complainant and Rs 4,000 as litigation cost,” the June 30 order read.

‘Lost job offer’

The complainant stated that she was working as an engineer at a reputed firm and had ordered a pair of black Skechers men’s casual shoes through the online platform on September 22, 2025, paying Rs 1,945.30 through GPay. She also purchased other items, taking the total order value to around Rs 5,200.

According to the complaint, the shoes were delivered on September 23, 2025, but the product received did not match the reference image displayed on the platform. She claimed that while she had ordered black shoes, the pair delivered had a white sole and differed from the advertised product. She allegedly returned the item the next day.

It was added that the Amazon seller agreed to refund the amount within one week. However, later the seller was allegedly not ready to refund the amount to the complainant, stating that the returned item was missing and was not received by them.

The complainant said she is an engineer and had planned to attend a meeting in Bengaluru on September 30, 2025, for a new job offer, but she lost the offer due to the company’s wrong attitude. She moved the commission, claiming that the seller’s action caused her mental agony and financial loss, and accused them of deficiency of service and unfair trade practice.

The commission noted that Amazon received notice of the proceedings but neither appeared before it nor filed a written version, following which it was proceeded against ex parte. It also noted that the woman did not provide any documentary evidence of her alleged loss of job opportunity.

The commission directed the seller to refund Rs 1,945 as the value of the product to the complainant, along with Rs 8,000 as compensation for mental agony caused to the complainant and Rs 4,000 as litigation cost within 30 days.

Significance of ruling

The ruling highlights that online marketplaces and sellers cannot refuse refunds without substantiating their claims, particularly when consumers are able to show that they returned a product that did not match the description or images displayed on the platform.

For consumer-related grievances, individuals may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states and union territories (Kerala: 1800-425-1550) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.