Karnataka HC upholds KSRTC driver’s conviction in fatal crash

[anap_hero_image fallback=”https://th-i.thgim.com/public/incoming/xb1bog/article71003547.ece/alternates/LANDSCAPE_1200/HC-restrains-trGN8G0JG9M.1.jpg.jpg”]

The Hindu

Karnataka HC upholds KSRTC driver’s conviction in fatal crash

Karnataka HC upholds KSRTC driver’s conviction in fatal crash Published – May 20, 2026 10:48 pm IST – Bengaluru The Hindu BureauObserving that “a professional driver is duty-bound to exercise heightened caution and is expected to anticipate unexpected…

India
May 20, 2026

[anap_share_buttons]

Karnataka HC upholds KSRTC driver’s conviction in fatal crash

Published – May 20, 2026 10:48 pm IST – Bengaluru

The Hindu Bureau

Observing that “a professional driver is duty-bound to exercise heightened caution and is expected to anticipate unexpected events within bus station premises,” the High Court of Karnataka upheld the conviction of a KSRTC driver who fatally knocked down a 75-year-old pedestrian inside the Chickballapura bus station in 2019.

Justice V. Srishananda made these observations while upholding the conviction of Nagaraj G.H., a resident of Tumakuru, for causing death by negligence under Section 304-A and rash driving under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code, and the one-year sentence imposed by the trial court.

The petitioner, who was driving a bus, hit Chitrashekharappa near platform 14 while the victim, along with his wife, was searching for a bus; he later succumbed to his injuries.

The court expressed disapproval of the driver’s defence strategy as, instead of explaining the circumstances, he had denied the occurrence of the accident entirely during his statement recorded under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

“Since the bus was moving inside the bus station, if the accused had driven the bus at the required speed and with diligence, he could have applied the brake to avoid dashing against Chitrashekharappa. Such an explanation is not forthcoming in the accused’s statement. Pertinently, in the spot mahazar, there is no brake marks noticed,” the court pointed.

Delving into the standard of care expected, the court remarked that the accused was required to exercise “extra diligence” precisely because he was driving inside the precincts of a bus station.

Rejecting the plea that the conviction would cost the petitioner his job and impact his family, the court held that such hardship cannot be treated as a mitigating circumstance to set aside the imprisonment, while directing him to surrender by May 31 to serve the remaining sentence.

Published – May 20, 2026 10:48 pm IST

[anap_related_posts]

  • Related Posts

    Punjab government to remove stray dogs from high footfall public spaces following Supreme Court order

    Bhagwant Mann said the government will create and maintain an adequate number of dog shelters where stray dogs can be properly cared for

    Rajasthan Cabinet approves new industrial development policy with focus on talent economy

    Industries and Commerce Minister Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore told journalists after the meeting that the new policy would provide incentives to micro, small, and medium enterprises, one district one product, and…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Rajasthan Cabinet approves new industrial development policy with focus on talent economy

    Punjab government to remove stray dogs from high footfall public spaces following Supreme Court order

    Public hearing for limestone mining called off in Meghalaya after protest

    Bengal CM on first visit to Delhi after taking charge, meets President, Prime Minister and Home Minister

    Elected government has no role in Jammu demolitions, says Farooq Abdullah

    Woman sustains injury at Kochi metro worksite