The Hindu
High Court seeks stand of Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia in criminal contempt case
High Court seeks stand of Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia in criminal contempt case The judge took exception to several social media posts by the proposed contemnors that attributed “political allegiance” and “affiliation” to her and allegedly targeted her…
High Court seeks stand of Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia in criminal contempt case
The judge took exception to several social media posts by the proposed contemnors that attributed “political allegiance” and “affiliation” to her and allegedly targeted her by posting a misleading “edited” video of a speech she gave at an educational institution in Varanasi
Updated – May 19, 2026 12:36 pm IST – New Delhi
AAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal, right, with party leader Manish Sisodia in New Delhi. File.
| Photo Credit: PTI
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday (May 19, 2026) issued notices to AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and others in suo motu contempt proceedings initiated by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma over an alleged scandalous social media campaign targeting her.
A bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja issued notice to the politicians on the suo motu contempt case initiated against them by Justice Sharma and granted them four weeks to file their response.
“Issue notice. The alleged contemnors will file their response within a period of four weeks from the receipt of notice,” the bench stated, as it listed the case for next hearing on August 4.
AAP, BJP spar over judge’s refusal to recuse from excise policy case
Justice Sharma had on May 14 initiated criminal contempt proceedings against Mr. Kejriwal, Mr. Sisodia and other AAP leaders over their “vilifying” social media posts against her in relation to the excise policy case.
Justice Sharma had asserted that the former Delhi chief minister “orchestrated a calculated campaign” of vilification against her on social media instead of pursuing his legal remedies and clarified that the CBI’s petition against the discharge of all accused persons would now be taken up by another bench.
The judge took exception to several social media posts by the proposed contemnors that attributed “political allegiance” and “affiliation” to her and allegedly targeted her by posting a misleading “edited” video of a speech she gave at an educational institution in Varanasi.
She also noted the wide circulation of clips from the court proceedings in the case, stating that the proposed contemnors were creating a “parallel narrative”, and that “remaining silent” was not judicial restraint but a “surrender before a powerful litigant”.
Will not appear before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in excise policy case: Kejriwal
On February 27, the trial court discharged Mr. Kejriwal, Mr. Sisodia and 21 others in the liquor policy case, as it ruled that the case was wholly unable to survive judicial scrutiny and stood discredited in its entirety.
After Justice Sharma dismissed their applications seeking her recusal in the CBI’s petition against their discharge in the case on April 20, Mr. Kejriwal, Mr. Sisodia and Pathak had written a letter to Justice Sharma, stating they would not appear before her personally or through a lawyer and would follow “Mahatma Gandhi’s path of Satyagraha”.
(with inputs from PTI)
Published – May 19, 2026 12:21 pm IST
Related Topics
Source & Attribution
This article was generated from an imported news source and rewritten for clarity and readability. View original source
[anap_related_posts]
Prateek Tanmay
